16 AugWe are what we choose

I had read the transcript of this speech when it was posted but never got around to watching the video until my friend Brian just posted it on facebook. I’m a big fan of Jeff Bezos “Regret Minimization Framework“. Jeff Bezos started Amazon at 31, and the more entrenched I’ve become in the tech startup world, the more I’ve learned that most successful entrepreneurs have started companies in their 30s and late 20s. Statistically, the Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, and Mark Zuckerbergs are outliers.

So here’s a video that’s a must watch for aspiring entrepreneurs.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vBmavNoChZc&feature=player_embedded#t=6m25s

Share

13 AugCan Starbucks enable a city-wide free Wifi?

One advantage of doing a tech startup is the freedom you have of working when and where. On the flip side, it’s really choosing the freedom of ‘where’ because as an entrepreneur you are ALWAYS working. I’ve begun working from coffee shops a lot. 35% of my foursquare check-ins are at coffee shops (And I think another 35% of them are at restaurants that serve Chicken Wings :P ) And because I get bored quickly, I make it a point to work from a different coffee shop every time. Today, I had a meeting in downtown Toronto, and then drove my Zipcar to Milton and am at a Starbucks at Milton preparing for my next meeting. Well, blogging instead.

My entrepreneurship prof at UofT always said ideas are cheap, “everyone has em”. And working full-time on one of my startup ideas, I’ve really come to realize how true it is. Execution is 99% of the battle. That’s a topic for another blog. I have a document with 100+ startup ideas and not enough lifetimes to implement all of them. I’m excited I’ll get to work on one of my small, fun ideas at Startup Weekend in Toronto, which I am helping out with as well.

So at the least, instead of those ideas living in a doc of mine, and me having spent an average of 2 mins on each idea, I think it would be cool to share some of my raw, unrefined ideas from time to time in hopes that someone creates value from them.

Right now, sitting at Starbucks, I cant help but think. Anytime I’m ANYWHERE, if I want wi-fi, I look for the nearest starbucks. I get my coffee, sit down with my laptop, and do some work. When I remember, I’ll do a foursquare check -in, hoping some day Starbucks will give me free coffee for it.

And there’s a Starbucks EVERYWHERE. What if starbucks could provide a whole city with free wi-fi? They could install routers, signal extenders, and repeaters to boost their range. People could login to starbucks wherever they are in the city. I’m sure they can figure a gajillion business models to make money from it. They are already working on a branded, personalized, and localized user experience online. That could be extended to not just people at Starbucks, people everyone in the city. They can either compete with ISP’s, or fill in the niche for people who only need 3G once in a while, maybe less than 50MB per month, so they dont need a data plan, and can pay starbucks much less. Starbucks can draw that crowd to their store, make more money on coffee.

Okay time to go back to preparing for my meeting in 45 minutes. Maybe starbucks will give me free coffee, or at least a free hug, for this blog post.

Share

26 JulTech Startup lessons from the German football team

Three minutes of extra time ended. The last German attack was also unable to break the Spanish defense. The score line: Spain 1 Germany 0. Millions of hearts broken as Germany’s fairy tale World Cup campaign ended. Being a life-long Germany fan, supporting them loyally since 1994, I was really bummed because I think this time around they had the most exciting team. Germany started the world cup with the second-youngest world cup team, one that had little experience playing at the International stage and with each other as a team. However, they surprised everyone with very creative and attacking soccer and quickly became one of the favourites.
Even though Germany did not win this world cup, they accomplished some amazing things and there is a lot to learn from this young, brave, and diverse German team. I believe if you spend some time comtemplating, you will find many hidden lessons in sports. Taking an unorthodox perspective, I am deriving lessons for tech startups from this German team. Here they are, in no particular order:


Be humble
Every world cup, there are teams that trash talk before the world cup has started and assume the world cup is their right. Usually they are the first to get eliminated. And then there are teams like Germany that stay humble, set low expectations with their fans, and focus on preparing for the world cup. Before the world cup started Arne Friedrich, one of the most experienced players in the team publicly said Germany is not the favourites to win. Yet when the world cup started, Germany became one of the favourites. Before the second round game against England, Assistant coach Hansi Flick said England were the favourites over Germany’s young team. Yet Germany beat England 4-1. Before the quarterfinal game against Argentina, Joachim Low said ”Argentina are a team with many qualities, I’m expecting an incredibly tight game”. Yet Germany beat Argentina 4-0. I think a humble approach allowed Germany to be more focused on the game.
I think the tech startup world is too competitive for there to be room for arrogance. Most startups fail. It’s tough. All the odds are stacked against you. A very small percentage of startups get funded. A fraction of those succeed. A smaller fraction of those result in a good exit for the founders. If you have a good idea, chances are someone’s already done it, or five other companies are already working on it. You never know when a large tech company moves into the same space and becomes a direct competitor. Those are some of the things I think about and plan for everyday. There’s opportunities to innovate in every space but when you get down to execution, there are a lot of challenges.  And so, you can’t help but be humble when you are aware of the realities.


Diverse teams are great only if they can work together as a team
Germany was a great example of what a diverse team can accomplish by operating as a team. 11 of the 23 squad members had foreign backgrounds, from places such as Turkey, Poland, Brazil, Ghana, Spain, Tunisia, Nigeria, and Bosnia. This was great because each player brought a unique playing style, and combined gave the German team the creative flair that impressed everyone.

France had a diverse team of immigrants with various backgrounds too. Except it wasn’t a team. There was no discipline, unity, or teamwork. There were fights internally and their whole world cup performance was an episode from a soap opera. They walked out of practices, disrespected their management. And they suffered an early exit from the world cup.
I think it’s important for the majority of tech startups to build a diverse team because they are often working on something new or innovative that requires a unique combination of skills and experiences. For example, a new financial software may require one founder from the financial industry and one founder who has a tech background. Also, you always want your co-founders to compliment you and bring different perspectives. This also means the team needs to work as a team with an aligned vision to succeed, despite differences in opinions.


Believe in your team
Germany’s strikers Klose and Podolski had a very poor season leading up to the world cup. They were missing the simplest of chances. The safest thing would have been to include the strikers that were in form in the Bundesliga league, such as Kevin Kuranyi. In fact, if things had gone wrong if Kuranyi was included, no one would’ve blamed the coach for making the pick. However, had Klose and Podolski not performed at the world cup, Coach Lowe would have been under some serious criticism. It was a very gutsy call but including Klose and Podolski proved to be the right decision.
Sometimes you just need to believe in your team even if there is no rationale for it. And when things go right, and the faith is rewarded, it’s a very fulfilling moment. This also means spending a lot of time upfront picking co-founders and early employees, and a lot of time team-building.


Having a great team is much more important than having individual stars
All the ‘stars’ of the world cup, Rooney, Ronaldo, and Messi, only scored one goal in 13 games. They were the three best players in the world yet disappointed everyone with lackluster performances. Individuals don’t win games. Teams win games. And managing team dynamics is really hard, but if done right, creates champions.
In the tech startup world, beyond each individuals qualifications and experiences, you also need to look at fit. Because if the fit isn’t there, more harm will be done than good. Often times, you have to drop the best person on paper in favour of a better fit. It’s extremely complex. But just like in sports, you need the best person for each position that will blend well into the team.


When you get down, get back up
This world cup, the second team I was rooting for was Team USA! I’ve lived in the US for 3.5 years and I think Team USA played with a lot of heart, character and integrity. During the group stages, there were so many calls that went against them that could’ve led to an early elimination. Their opponents were teams that played very dirty soccer, diving and cheating excessively. They had several goals taken back due to incorrect offside calls, including one against Slovenia which would have been the game winner and one against Algeria during regular time which would’ve put them ahead. However, in the last minute of extra time, they found a way to score, beat Algeria, and top the group. They didn’t give up. They didn’t complain. They kept fighting on.
This probably applies to the tech startup world on not just a daily basis, but sometimes on an hourly basis. There are so many moments when you are down and things don’t go according to plan. But you have to keep getting back up, find ways around obstacles, and continue to fight for your dreams.


Play to your strengths
The Germany coach, Joachim Loew, got his tactics right in every game except for the one against Spain. To his credit, I think the squad didn’t have the depth to execute the defensive + counter attack strategy he devised for the game. I think if he had played a more attacking strategy, which was natural for the team, Germany might have won 3-2. (Or might have lost 4-3). At the least, I think they would’ve put on a much better game.


Similarly, in tech startups, I think chances of success are much higher if you play to your strengths. Sometimes you need to work for another startup or a large corporation, or do a smaller startup to build your strengths before you are ready to start your dream startup. And it also helps you identify what areas you need co-founders or early employees to fill so you can continue to play to your strengths.


As far as Germany goes, I think they will win one of the next 2-3 world cups. I’m sure that within a decade, I’ll be a proud Germany fan. And that moment will be a very special moment. Generation after generation, Germany has always been a team with strong nerves. They don’t panic. And that is one of the reasons they make it far every world cup, runners up in 2002, and 3rd place in 2006 and 2010. I was hoping Ballack would be this decade’s Beckenbauer and lead Germany to a world cup win this year and I’ve been wearing #13 since 2000. My hope is that Schweinsteiger or Lahm will take the baton next world cup. Deutschland Uber Alles
Share

16 JulHow Breakthroughs Happen

I’m neck deep in work. Behind where I want to be and more work piling than I know how to handle. Staying up late, waking up early, the typical, inhuman hours. Two days ago I was on Amazon ordering a book on jQuery to learn more about jQuery. I had to order one more book to qualify for free shipping. I have a very long wish list on Amazon but I wasn’t feeling very excited about reading any of the books on that list, which is unusual. I found an interesting book called “How Breakthroughs Happen” by Andrew Hargadon. Both books arrived today, and despite my busy schedule I began reading “How Breakthroughs Happen”. I couldn’t put that book down. I think it is a must read for startups, engineers, entrepreneurs, designers, managers, scientists, and students.

I think part of the reason I fell in love with the book instantly was how relevant it was to me, doing an an early stage GreenTech startup. The book shatters myths on innovations, explains the difference between invention and innovation, analyzes prior technological revolutions as well as companies that changed the technological landscape. Even though it’s now 4AM, I feel so energized after having read the book and want to share some of my favourite excerpts from the book.

  • Innovation is as much social as it is technical
  • Technologies are formed of tightly coupled arrangements of people, ideas, and objects. Innovation is a process of taking apart and reassembling these elements in new combinations
  • It is one thing to know of a technology. It’s something different to know how to apply it, what else it can do, and how to adapt it to new settings
  • In 1900, the automobile industry was in its infancy. There were fifty-seven firms devoted to building cars in the United States, and those firms built 1,681 steam-powered, 1,575 electric-powered, and 936 gasoline-powered vehicles. At the time, owning a car was an extravagance afforded mainly by the rich. By 1905, however, the industry was taking shape, offering glimpses of what it might look like when it matured. in those five years, for example, the design standardized around the internal combustion engine, reducing understainty on the part of entrepreneurs, investors, and potential owners alike. And by 1906, Henry Ford knew the direction the market was going: “The greatest need today is a light, low-priced car with an up-to-date engine of ample horsepower, and built of the very best material… It must be powerful enough for American roads and capable of carrying its passengers anywhere that a horse-drawn vehicle will go without the driver being afraid of ruining his car”. He wasn’t the only one with that vision. The idea of a low-cost car was no different than the idea of a low-cost computer today. The problem, like today, was building one.
  • A closer look at the origins of mass production reveals the role of recombinant innovation at the Ford Motor Company. Ford invented neither the automobile nor the technique he used to mass produce it, but he did bring these ideas together in a way no one else had before
  • Flanders and Wollering stayed long enough to show Ford the value of dedicated machine tools for the production of accurate parts at high volumes, but not so long as to set in place their old understanding of how to use them. [They left after 2 years at Ford]
  • Too many times entrepreneurs have attempted to walk in the footsteps of Edison, Ford, or whoever – determined to be as boldly individualistic as history tells us these long geniuses were. But they weren’t. What set them apart … is the recognition that innovation requires not just a new idea (built from combinations of old ones) but also the collective effort necessary to make that new idea work. Innovation requires building a community of like-minded and wholly committed individuals who see their shared future in the success of the emerging technologies and industries
Share

17 JunSo what kind of tech startup do you want to build?

I have now been working on my startup full-time for over two months and want to share a few things I have learned that may be useful to people considering making the leap to start a company. The tech startup world is a whole new world and it required me to learn a very different way of thinking than when working in a large (or rather largest in the world, while I was there) software company. When I decided I was going to make the leap, all I had was an idea that made it to the top of my list of 100+ ideas, and I had done a lot of research in the GreenTech industry and run ideas by many folks in the GreenTech industry. That was enough for me because there’s no better way to learn than jumping into things, and it wasn’t something I could make much progress working part-time.

I began to go to a lot of startup events, read about successful and failed startups, talk to established tech entrepreneurs, angel investors, and venture capitalists. My favourite book is “Founders at work” because it has a diverse set of startup success stories. My favourite blog is Mark Suster‘s “Both Sides Of the Table” because I think Mark brings in great insights being both an entrepreneur and a venture capitalist. I also find Mark’s blog especially useful because he explains his advice and thoughts in depth based on his experiences, which is good because it helps you understand the context of the advice and whether it applies to you or not. There are several other really famous people with popular blogs in the startup world but I’ve always felt there’s a degree of self-promotion in their posts, whereas Mark’s posts feel more genuine to me.

One of the things I hadn’t thought of initially that led me to go back to the drawing board a while back is that I never spent time thinking about what kind of startup I wanted to build. I think it’s important because I think it also limits the kinds of ideas you can work on. Buiding a startup and getting funded is very complex and the entire process has many variations. However, I’m going to simplify the analysis here and look at three scenarios and types of startups:

1) Startups with no funding

2) Startups with growth funding to scale revenues

3) Startups with early stage funding

A couple notes:

  • There are many funding options, it can be angel funding, incubator funding, VC funding. We’re going to consider them all the same for simplicity of this analysis
  • There are many exit strategies too, such as IPO’s and acquisitions. VC funded startups go to IPO, for the rest we’ll assume exit is acquisition

No Funding

In self-funded or bootstrapped startups, typically founders take the startup to revenue, grow it organically to a sustainable business and eventually exit without any outside money.



Growth Funding

In this scenario, founders typically are able to get the company to revenue, but use funding to scale the revenue model and/or take a niche idea mainstream

Early Stage Funding

Founders figure their product market fit, or at least have done some validation. It’s hard to get investor money without at least a prototype, initial users, and some market validation. Then, heavy VC investments come in to build a team that can deliver on vision, typically tens of engineers.

Thinking about what kind of startup I want to build caused me to pivot a lot with my ideas but I think eventually it enabled me to make better decisions of where I want to be.  Early exits are more capital efficient than VC funded startups, and exits happen much sooner than VC funded startups (3-4 years vs. 12+ years on average). However, VC funded startups are the ones that have the big, famous exits like Mint.com, which I think most entrepreneurs dream of. Also, it’s a lifestyle choice. In VC funded startups, founders lose freedom and control but on the other hand, through the VC’s resources, founders can build a very strong network, accomplish a lot more, hire young rock stars, and work on really big ideas. There are advantages and disadvantages to each approach so do give this some thought when founding a tech startup!

Resources:

http://www.startupcfo.ca/?p=329

http://www.early-exits.com/Early_Exits_Reviews.html

EAVB_NEIEMJQHHZ

Share

06 MaySmart Meters in unlikely locations

A couple of weeks back I was in Charlottetown, Prince Edward Islands, a small Canadian city with a population of about 30,000. It’s a beautiful city with a small downtown and a very scenic harbourfront, unspoilt by industrialization. It’s the kind of city I want to go back to whenever I need a break and some downtime. Life is so laid back. The water is so calm and still.

I began wandering aimlessly around the city and right outside a house, I noticed an Itron Smart Meter!! Charlottetown is one of the last places in Canada I was expecting to see a Smart Meter. I walked around the block and every house I could see had an Itron Smart Meter outside it. I was very surprised to see Charlottetown being an early adopter of Smart Meters when there are major cities in the United States still working on installing their first Smart Meters.

Most people I talk to are unclear on what Smart Meters are or what the Smart Grid is. In short, Smart Meters measure each home’s energy consumption data in more details and report back to utilities over a wireless network. This way, someone from the utility company does not have to take down meter readings every 2 months. In Ontario, every hour the current meter reading is sent back to the utility. Smart Meters are a key component of the Smart Grid, which is a modern electricity grid enabling two way communication between each home and utilities, increased reliability and security, more data to help manage and optimize energy consumption, and better integration with renewable energy sources.

Some of the major problems with the traditional power grid are:

1) Consumers do not have data to understand and optimize their energy consumption

Traditionally, homeowners see a bill from their utilities containing their total energy consumption for an entire month. However, they are unaware of what parts of their homes or what appliances/devices are contributing to the bill and how they can reduce their bills.

Secondly, because the traditional electricity bill only displays monthly consumption data, there is limited trending data available to users. The only conclusions a consumer can draw from the limited trending information available is what months his or her energy consumption is at a highest and by what percentage compared to other months. However, if we had more granular trending data such as “Your air conditioning usage increases by 80% between May and June, which is 40% above your neighbourhood average”, users would be able to make corrective measures to reduce their bills. Furthermore, comparisons with averages such as neighbourhood average or city-wide average will help set a baseline for consumers to set energy efficiency goals.

2) Consumers are unaware of ways to improve their energy efficiency

The average home owner has no expertise in improving home energy efficiency. Let’s take Toronto and Ontario as an example. One of the biggest energy conservation challenges identified by the Ontario Power Authority is Customer Awareness.

Government-supported efforts such as Green$aver have been launched to help residents of Toronto improve their energy efficiency. It is partially motivated by the fact that the City of Toronto determined that more of the city’s CO2 emissions came from houses (30%) than cars (20%) because most Toronto homes were built before 1960 and were poorly insulated. Such efforts have met with some success. For example, retrofits of Toronto Community Housing units done by Green$aver have achieved permanent 35% – 40% reduction in energy use, more comfortable homes, and reductions in greenhouse gas emissions of over 3 tonnes per house annually. Having more data about energy consumption enables us to improve energy efficiency.

3) There are no incentives to shift energy consumption

Taking Toronto as an example again (mainly because I live in Toronto!): to manage peak demand, Toronto Hydro has come up with a Time Of Use pricing structure which encourages consumers to reduce energy consumption at peak times and shift it to off-peak times.

For utilities like Toronto Hydro, the advantage is reduce cost because additional energy generation during peak times is costly. There is a significant price difference between off-peak and peak-time this new pricing structure which presents consumers with an opportunity to optimize their usage and drive more consumption to off-peak times. The most important scenario is plug-in electric vehicles. As PHEV’s become more popular, we’ll need better ways to manage the charging so we ensure this extra load is distributed. If we don’t distribute the load over time, it is the equivalent of a traffic jam in the electricity network, except it can result in blackouts (which results in more profanity than a regular traffic jam!)

Utilities are already trying to help consumers shift their loads, but they obvious lack the resources and expertise to manage each home’s energy consumption optimally. For instance, Toronto hydro has started a program called peaksaver in which they pay customers $75 and swallow the cost of installing a small device on the customers Air Conditioners which reduces the AC’s energy consumption during peak hours

Therefore, Smart Meters enable a Smarter utility grid, which creates many more possibilities for innovations around managing and optimizing energy consumption. And for someone like me building a startup in this space, it’s very exciting to see adoption of these smart meters in seemingly unlikely locations like Charlottetown. Keep installing them Smart Meters!!

Share

21 AprGovernment’s role in GreenTech

As we stand on the verge of what I and many believe is one of the next big waves of technology innovations, the GreenTech industry, and given the varying levels of government commitment to this industry around the world, I wonder what (if any) the role of Government is in the growth of this industry.
In many ways GreenTech is more than just about technology because technology alone won’t solve many of the problems the GreenTech industry is planning to solve. Every technological or industrial revolution drove social change in addition to breaking technological barriers. For example, during the industrial revolution Europe moved from an agricultural economy to an industry-based economy and goods that were produced in homes by every member of the family were now produced in factories which altered the family structure. The Internet revolution has enabled us to connect with friends and family across the globe instantaneously. Progress in technology continually impacts the social fabric of society.
To a certain extent, that’s the magnitude of change that is currently needed. While we need technologies to provide us energy from alternative sources and to optimize our energy consumption, we also consumers to adopt more eco-friendly energy consumption habits. Technology just helps accelerate that. There are many analysts and investors who already believe the GreenTech industry will be much larger than the Internet in terms of both:
Introduced by Venture Beat’s Matt Marshall as “The best known investor in Web 1.0, involved in the founding of Amazon, Netscape, and Google,” John Doerr and his firm, Kleiner Perkins, have raised a billion dollars to be channeled into greentech. “Greentech could be the largest economic opportunity of the 21st century,” said Doerr.
and the technology:

“Our expectation is that this network [Smart Grid] will be 100 or 1,000 times larger than the Internet. If you think about it, some homes have Internet access, but some don’t. Everyone has electricity access–all of those homes could potentially      be connected,” Marie Hattar, vice president of marketing in Cisco’s Network Systems Solutions group.

Some of the factors to lead this change are already in place. In many large cities, there is a higher level of eco-consciousness now than ever before which means the market is larger than ever.Technologies for alternative fuel sources such as Solar and Wind have been around for decades, and new, creative sources of alternative fuel are being prototyped. In the past few years, Venture Capital funding has been the highest in the GreenTech/CleanTech industry. Smart people with lots of money are investing a lot of capital and making big bets on this industry. And to a very varying degree, Governments around the world are also committing to meeting their energy efficiency and carbon reduction goals.
I moved back to Ontario to start my own GreenTech company and one of the factors that made this decision easier was the level of commitment the Government of Ontario has in making Ontario a worldwide leader in the Green Industry. And it’s inspiring to imagine the possibilities of what this could mean for Ontario, from greater economic prosperity to being a model for environmental sustainability for other provinces, states, and countries.
In May 2009, the passing of the Ontario Green Energy Act set the direction that Ontario is heading with its Green initiatives. And right off the bat, I think Ontario is making the right call by building strong partnerships early on with emerging markets such as India, China, and Korea. Traditionally, Ontario’s economy has been manufacturing base and very closely dependent on the US market.
However, it’s clear that future global economic growth will be driven by emerging markets and if GreenTech is going to have a significant piece of the pie in that growth, then Ontario is in a great position to capitalize on that growth.


International Green Trade Agreements
In the past 18 months, the Ontario Environmental Trade Missions have made the following major trade agreements:
  • $600 million dollars worth of new contracts for Ontarian GreenTech companies doing business in China. In this deal, green technologies developed in Ontario such as Geothermal systems will be used in Chinese projects.
  • $650 million dollars worth of new contracts for Ontarian GreenTech companies doing business in India.
  • An astounding $7 billion investment by Korean companies led by Samsung to create four manufacturing plants and use Ontario produced steels to increase Solar and Wind output in Ontario.
Overall, I think this means great financial potential for Ontario-based GreenTech companies because there are channels open for those companies to do business internationally.


Government Green Initiatives in Ontario
The Government of Ontario is driving several local initiatives in the generation, distribution, and consumption of energy. Let’s look at some of them.
Today, Clean energy sources make up a much greater percentage of energy generation than before. Ontario’s coal-fired electricity generation fell by 73% from 2003 to 2009, from 36.3 billion kWh in 2003 to 9.8 billion kWh, and now only makes 6.6% of Ontario’s total electricity. Just 2 years ago, the number that was at 18%.
A massive infrastructure upgrade is needed because the current power grid infrastructure is inefficient, can’t differentiate between clean and non-clean energy sources, and provides limited ability to manage end user energy consumption. In 2006, Ontario already began the Smart Grid Initiative to install smart meters in every home and residence by 2010 and that deployment is on track to be complete by the end of the year.
Transportation is a major carbon sink and electric cars require an infrastructure for their regular operation because they need charging stations, just like regular cars need gas stations. Better place is setting up a Canadian head office in Ontario and they will build an electric car demonstration and education centre in Toronto to lay the groundwork to help get electric vehicles running on Ontario roads.
Ontario is investing in public schools to make them more energy efficient with a $550 million investment which will also create 5,500 green jobs. Schools that are upgraded get on the certified EcoSchool program.


Government’s role in GreenTech
This is great progress but also leads to an argument: Is it the most efficient utilization of resources to have government drive this growth or should we let the free market efficiencies instigate and drive this growth?
I think it’s necessary for the government to provide the infrastructure for any technological revolution and to foster an environment where entrepreneurs and inventors can thrive. In India, the tech industry’s growth is being hindered because of infrastructure issues such as blackouts and traffic jams and China does not have the same problem because or the large scale government investments in China’s infrastructure. Let’s also take some lessons from history and analyze the Industrial revolution.


Industrial revolution
During the industrial revolution, everything from population growth, raw materials, consumers, inventors, entrepreneurs, investors, and merchants had a part to play, and so did the British government which was one of the reasons why the Industrial revolution originated in the UK.
Firstly, the UK had a large domestic market, and unlike other nations, there was no barrier to trade between different regions in the UK. Other countries were split up by local regions who imposed tolls and tariffs on goods traded amongst them. This allowed the goods created in factories to be easily traded which was a key driver in the industrial revolution.
Secondly, the patent system developed by the government rewarded inventors by giving them monopolies in return for revealing the workings of the invention, and thus increasing the pace of development and the number of technological innovations.
Thirdly, the English Parliament was under the control of merchant and capitalist classes which led to many legislation that favoured mercantile and capitalist interests. This was not the case in other countries which still had Monarchies. The British Government chartered trading firms such as British East India Company to facilitate trade.
Lastly, the British government had built a good naval system, which played a key role in facilitating trade with other European countries and around the world. This was an infrastructure also helped British companies acquire raw materials needed for manufacturing, which fueled the Industrial revolution.
Therefore, the British government invested in the infrastructure and created an environment where the Industrial Revolution could originate. Obviously, many other players apart from the government had to be present to make the Industrial revolution possible, but the government played an indispensable role.


GreenTech needs some government
Even the internet began as a military project. In “Seeing What’s Next”, a book I read a few years ago, Clayton Christensen repeatedly argues how government regulations can make or break innovation.
However, beyond providing the infrastructure and the regulatory support, it’s probably most efficient for the government to let the free market forces handle the rest. Several governments tried rebates for solar and wind, but quickly learned that they are not sustainable programs and most of them have ended or are being scrapped. Also, in those cases, the other problem is that government begins to decide what technologies are eligible for such programs, and the government is not the most qualified to make those decisions. I think Ontario’s Emerging Technology Fund is an example of a good way to catalyze GreenTech growth, where the government matches investments in GreenTech startups made by angel investors. By doing so, government is supporting GreenTech startups while letting investors decide which startups will get funded. And this puts GreenTech startups in Ontario at an advantage over their peers in other provinces and states, and hopefully will accelerate GreenTech growth in Ontario.
The GreenTech industry is new so we’re still learning as we go, but I think it’s clear that government will be one of the driving forces.
Share

28 MarMy April plans

Wow, I’ve been so busy with the move and have hardly had any time to blog. Lesson learned: moving countries is a lot of work. I’ve been swamped with figuring out taxes/retirement plans, moving logistics, selling my stuff, cancelling all my services, spending more time with close friends, wrapping up things at Microsoft and in Seattle, and working on my travel plans in April.

April looks like it’s going to be a great month. Here goes:

April 2-6: Vegas. It’s Rohit’s bachelor party and we will get into a lot of trouble.

April 6->April 27: taking the VIA rail and travelling coast to coast across Canada. Starting in Vancouver and going as far east as I can, to Nova Scotia and Newfoundland. I haven’t done much planning apart from picking up lonely planet Canada and finding out how the VIA works. I’m only planning my first 2-3 days and then will play the rest of the trip by ear.

I’m excited about this trip because I’ve always wanted to see all parts of Canada. Each province is so different and unique and has its own story to tell. Also, the long train rides will give me a lot of time to think about my business ideas.

April 28 – May 2: San Francisco to attend my first ever business conference: GreenNet 2010 and stay the weekend to hang out with Kevin and some friends in San Francisco.

This also means I might not be able to blog in April either. But I hope to have lots to share in May.

Share

05 MarMy favourite spam mail of all time

So today I got my favourite junk mail of all time. It was from signed by FBI Director Robert Mueller on behalf of the FBI’s Anti-Terrorist and International Fraud Division. Apparently the FBI is helping me transfer $800,000 to my bank account from some lottery I won outside the US.

All they want is for me to write a check of $500 to an obscure gentleman because of all the costs the FBI incurred while investigating this money transfer for me.

Man, that is so nice of the FBI.

Share

20 FebFeb 23 – Proof of Seattle’s commitment to GreenTech

Last September, YPIN was kind enough to select me to be on their board. In my application, I expressed my interest in organizing a GreenTech event to raise awareness of the innovations in the field. I am passionate about using technology to help improve energy efficiency, reduce our carbon footprint, and I felt YPIN was the ideal non-profit organization in Seattle that could make such an event happen.

In talking to other new board members,  I met Benjamin and we quickly discovered we have similar interests and started brainstorming for the event. Amber and Philippe joined the team right after the first board meeting and that was how the YPIN event “Innovations & Careers in the GreenTech Industry” was born.

Since then, there has been no turning back. We put together a dream-team panel of GreenTech experts in Seattle. We’ve done a lot of promotion through social networking and have been able to reach thousands of young professionals in Seattle. We booked a fabulous venue, Pravda Studios. We even have a book signing by one of our panelists Kevin Wilhelm, CEO of Sustainable Business Consulting, and we have past winners and organizers of the CleanTech Open, an organization that fosters entrepreneurship and clean technologies, to help aspiring entrepreneurs in the audience learn more about how they make their ideas a reality.

What I am most excited about is the impact this event, I feel, can have on Seattle’s Green economy. We’re going to have a panel with leaders of Seattle’s GreenTech industry, and an audience of about 200 young, ambitious, professionals, looking to make a difference and wanting to learn how. During the panel, we’ll hear stories about how each of these leaders got into the GreenTech industry and got to where they are today, and we’ll get firsthand access to their insights on where the industry is heading, and where the innovations and opportunities of the future are. During the networking time, we are putting together a couple of hundred ambitious young professionals in an environment where they can share ideas and learn from each other. They might find their next business partner for a GreenTech venture, a lead to a job at a GreenTech startup, or learn about an area within this industry that will eventually become their passion. And any of those connections or realizations are going to influence the direction Seattle’s Green industry is headed. I truly believe Seattle is going to be a leader in the Global GreenTech industry and events like this are further proof of how committed people in Seattle are to this effort. Four of the Global CleanTech Top 100 companies are based in Washington state, and one of them, Infinia, will be at our event.

At a personal level, this event helped me confirm that GreenTech is what I am truly passionate about. My energy level skyrockets whenever I think about, read about, or work on anything related to Green technologies. And this was instrumental in helping me make the decision to start a GreenTech company back in Toronto.

Thanks for reading, my friends, and I hope to see you there! I’m sharing the event details below.

When? February 23rd 2010

6pm – Doors Open

7pm to 9pm – Panel Discussion and Q&A

9pm to 11pm – Post event networking

Where? Pravda Studios, 1406 10th avenue suite 200

Price? $8 for YPIN Members, $12 for Non-members

Panelists:

  • David Leonhardi (Moderator), a Business Strategist at Boeing
  • J.D. Sitton, CEO of Infinia, a global CleanTech Top 100 firm developing solar power generation systems.
  • Kevin Wilhelm, CEO of Sustainable Business Consulting, delivers solutions to help clients meet profitability and sustainability goals.
  • Bryan Guy, Managing Director of Cypress Venture Group, a startup developing smart grid solutions
  • Clare Nordquist, Director at Cascadia Capitals, an investment bank for sustainable technologies
  • William Einstein, Manager, Emerging Technologies & Climate Change department, Puget Sound Energy
  • T. Ron Davis, Chief Marketing Officer, Vu1, a Seattle-based startup developing a new technology for energy efficient lighting

Link to event flyer with panelist bio’s and details

Share